[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F765A72.6090006@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:14:26 +0800
From: Ren Mingxin <renmx@...fujitsu.com>
To: Asias He <asias.hejun@...il.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
VIRTUAL <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio_blk: use disk_name_format() to support mass
of disks naming
Hi, He:
On 03/30/2012 07:22 PM, Asias He wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Ren Mingxin<renmx@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> The current virtblk's naming algorithm only supports 263 disks.
>> If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 263), there will be disks
>> with the same name.
> This fix is pretty nice. However, current virtblk's naming still
> supports up to 18278 disks, no?
> ( index 0 -> vda, index 18277 -> vdzzz ).
Sorry, I intended to type 26^3+ (26^2+26)...
It may still be a restriction which should be improved though.
Thanks,
Ren
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists