[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120330102910.GB22981@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:29:10 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] dmaengine: add a slave parameter to
__dma_request_channel()
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 03:28:39PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Yessss!!! Let's do that! :-D Now, you're proposing exactly the same, as
> what I was proposing! :-) Now you just have to remove the filter function
> parameter from dma_request_channel() - it is anyway the same for all and
> implemented in the dmaengine core - and you get
>
> dma_request_channel(mask, slave_desc)
>
> which is exactly what I was proposing! :-)
Bollocks it is. You're wanting to use the peripheral address, width
and burst size to try to determine what channel to use. That's a
totally crackpot idea, and as I've already said several times it won't
work in many real life cases we have already.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists