linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120330114633.GA16502@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:46:33 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per
 package v2

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:05:29AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> Andi,
> Can you re-base this on top of my release tree?
> 
> Your fix is important, but conflicted with mjg's
> more invasive percentage -> frequency change.

Sorry, I think it's probably better not to take my patch here - the spec 
uses percentages rather than frequencies. I'm not convinced that that 
makes sense, but there's some chance that some behaviour may end up 
depending on that.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/