linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F75A070.9020008@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:00:48 -0400
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: Do cpufreq clamping for throttling per package
 v2

On 03/30/2012 07:46 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:05:29AM -0400, Len Brown wrote:
>> Andi,
>> Can you re-base this on top of my release tree?
>>
>> Your fix is important, but conflicted with mjg's
>> more invasive percentage -> frequency change.
> 
> Sorry, I think it's probably better not to take my patch here - the spec 
> uses percentages rather than frequencies. I'm not convinced that that 
> makes sense, but there's some chance that some behaviour may end up 
> depending on that.
> 


Ok Matthew, I've dropped your patch and pulled in Andi's.

thanks,
-Len
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/