[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120330172124.GA28178@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:21:24 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL/NEXT] sched/arch: Introduce the
finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler callback
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:25:44PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:47:16PM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Anyway - regardless of any differences and flames about workflow
> > > details, both you and Catalin should still feel free to use both
> > > the original commit (1cf00341547a) or the tip:sched/arch branch
> > > I provided (01f23e1630d9).
> >
> > About the scheduler hook patch, would it go into mainline via
> > the sched/urgent or the sched/arch branch? I would like to
> > rebase the ARM-specific patches on top of one of these
> > branches and send you a pull request (with Russell's ack).
>
> I've merged it into sched/urgent yesterday, which I'll send to
> Linus - so you can base it on that.
Thanks.
Russell, are you happy for me to add your acked-by to the ARM patches?
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists