linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 00:35:25 +0300
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, drepper@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2)

On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 07:21:59PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2012, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >  arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl |    1 +
> >  arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl |    1 +
> >  fs/Makefile                      |    1 +
> >  fs/nextfd.c                      |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/syscalls.h         |    1 +
> >  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> I don't have any comments on the syscall itself, but when you add one, please
> also make the change to include/asm-generic/unistd.h so it appears in the
> various architectures using the generic syscall table.

I will.
The amount of places to plug new syscall is suprising. :-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/