[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120401213748.GA17795@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 23:37:48 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] (Was: syscall_regfunc() && TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
On 03/31, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 22:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > So what do you think we should do,
> >
> > - keep this check
> >
> > - remove it
> >
> > - remove it in a separate patch
>
> I say this one (remove it in a separate patch). That way if something
> breaks we know exactly what did it ;-)
OK, agreed.
Don't really know how can I test this... but the kernel didn't
crash after I enabled the syscall tracer ;)
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists