[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb92A9BEXtVWK3-Fb4E-VmKqp1YtDTEUvD8WShY=hk3cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:52:22 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:14:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:39:11AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> > Mark: as Rabin says the v1 patch is probably fine, are you pushing this
>> > to ARM SoC or into Russell's patch tracker?
>>
>> I was waiting for some pronouncement from Russell - looking at the git
>> logs it seems the patch tracker is the normal way to merge things.
>
> Well, this stuff was invented by Linus, so its Linus' decision about
> how to deal with the power control.
This falls into the "seemed like a good idea at the time" category,
I was wrong, we implemented power domains instead, so let's just
kill it before someone else hurts him/herself on it...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists