linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120402113413.GA7560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:34:13 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support

On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:14:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I was waiting for some pronouncement from Russell - looking at the git
> > logs it seems the patch tracker is the normal way to merge things.

> Well, this stuff was invented by Linus, so its Linus' decision about
> how to deal with the power control.

Linus already acked the patch, the question was more about how to get it
merged.  Since most of the AMBA changes seem to go via your tree I've
just submitted it to the patch system as 7366/1.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)