linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 58/76] idle, x86: Allow off-lined CPU to enter deeper C states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+8MBbLROfbyfAGZ0xn1tZVHsndeTUNrn=-gHhsfzkocBLh=iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:13:46 -0700
From:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 58/76] idle, x86: Allow off-lined CPU to enter deeper C states

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>

This bit breaks ia64 build:

> +
> +/**
> + * acpi_idle_play_dead - enters an ACPI state for long-term idle (i.e. off-lining)
> + * @dev: the target CPU
> + * @index: the index of suggested state
> + */
> +static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
> +{
> +       struct cpuidle_state_usage *state_usage = &dev->states_usage[index];
> +       struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = cpuidle_get_statedata(state_usage);
> +
> +       ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE();
> +
> +       while (1) {
> +
> +               if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_HALT)
> +                       halt();
> +               else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_SYSTEMIO) {
> +                       inb(cx->address);
> +                       /* See comment in acpi_idle_do_entry() */
> +                       inl(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block.address);
> +               } else
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +       }

drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c: In function 'acpi_idle_play_dead':
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:789: error: implicit declaration of
function 'halt'

So the initial compiler complaint is just about "halt()" - but those "inb()" and
"inl()" parts don't look very ia64 compatible either.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/