lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBbJnrhKmy5f_pbL8Ogi1ihM-51hfqCDY5gUQ1hkvw7p22Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:25:27 -0700
From:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 58/76] idle, x86: Allow off-lined CPU to enter deeper C states

>> +       while (1) {
>> +
>> +               if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_HALT)
>> +                       halt();

What's the intent here?  I think that I can just set up a function pointer
named "halt" on ia64 and point it to my cpu_halt() function (which looks
for the deepest C-state, and then calls PAL to enter it. Is that equivalent
to what the x86 "halt()" function does?

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ