[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120402174557.GA9446@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:45:57 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 58/76] idle, x86: Allow off-lined CPU to enter deeper C
states
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 10:25:27AM -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> >> + while (1) {
> >> +
> >> + if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_HALT)
> >> + halt();
>
> What's the intent here? I think that I can just set up a function pointer
> named "halt" on ia64 and point it to my cpu_halt() function (which looks
> for the deepest C-state, and then calls PAL to enter it. Is that equivalent
> to what the x86 "halt()" function does?
Or use the appropiate safe_halt() which should work on IA64.
>
> -Tony
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists