linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] regulator: Rework s5m8767_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF+7xWnqL1RCTt5cuaVY+MYzjJSZM-=+3nhPdekCurcOV9yOpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:00:42 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To:	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] regulator: Rework s5m8767_set_voltage to support
 both LDOs and BUCKs

> Hi, Axel
> Basically, Your optimization code looks good.
> But, S5M8767A support 9 Bucks.
> Please Add #9 Buck handling too.
Current code does hand #9 buck in s5m8767_set_voltage().

> As you know, 3.4-rc1 is released.
> Please rebase your patch on 3.4-rc1.
> Some feature is added on 3.4-rc1.
I just try to apply the patch to Mark's for-next tree and linux-next tree.
It looks ok. So I think no need to re-generate the patch.

Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/