[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F7AC6A5.6050907@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:15:09 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, stern@...land.harvard.edu, rjw@...k.pl,
pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] NMI received for unknown reason 3c on CPU 0, strange
powersaving mode?
On 04/03/2012 12:57 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Montag, 2. April 2012 schrieb Srivatsa S. Bhat:
>> On 03/30/2012 04:34 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Since some time I am seeing things like
>>>
>>> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Mar 30 00:29:30 ...
>>>
>>> kernel:[49074.294260] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3c on
>>> CPU 0.
>>>
>>> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Mar 30 00:29:30 ...
>>>
>>> kernel:[49074.294263] Do you have a strange power saving mode
>>> enabled?
>>>
>>> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Mar 30 00:29:30 ...
>>>
>>> kernel:[49074.294264] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
>>>
>>> on resume after in-kernel hibernation.
>>
>> Do you see this after suspend-to-ram too?
>
> No.
Ok..
>
>>> I do not see any trace of it in syslog, kern.log or dmesg.
>>>
>>> From the timestemp it seems that these messages are issued shortly
>>> before I send the laptop to hibernation last night.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am using a ThinkPad T520 with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @
>>> 2.50GHz and Sandybridge graphics.
>>>
>>> I am not exactly sure since when it happens, cause I basically
>>> ignored it for quite some time. Might be some 3.2 kernel where it
>>> started, maybe even the first 3.2 kernel I had. Currently I am
>>> using:
>>>
>>> martin@...kaba:~> cat /proc/version
>>> Linux version 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (Debian 3.3-1~experimental.1)
>>> (debian- kernel@...ts.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian
>>> 4.6.3-1) ) #1 SMP Thu Mar 22 18:02:10 UTC 2012
>>>
>>> Since I am quite sure I didnĀ“t see this with the first kernel I used
>>> on this machine, which was a 2.6.39 if I remember correctly, I
>>> consider this to be a regression for now.
>>>
>>>
>>> I did not see any other strange effects, only this message.
>>>
>>>
>>> When searching for it I see quite some referencesĀ¹. But what I looked
>>> at seemed to either quite old or different in that the machine was
>>> frozen then.
>>
>> There was once such a bug report and commit 144060fee (perf: Add PM
>> notifiers to fix CPU hotplug races) tried to fix it, however it didn't
>> work out IIRC.
>>
>> Can you please try out the pm-test framework and let us know in which
>> phase this message is encountered?
>> Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
>>
>> 1. Recompile the kernel with CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y
>
> Luckily I have this already.
>
> martin@...kaba:~> grep CONFIG_PM_DEBUG /boot/config-3.3.0-trunk-amd64
> CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y
>
>> 2. # cat /sys/power/pm_test
>> 3. # echo <value> > /sys/power/pm_test
>> Use the values from the list given in step 2.
>> From freezer to core, it is increasing depth of suspend phase.
>> 4. # echo mem > /sys/power/state (for suspend-to-ram)
>> or echo disk > /sys/power/state (for suspend-to-disk)
>
> I understand it that you want me to do step 4 for each of the values from
> step 3. If not so, please tell me.
>
Yes, that's right. And moreover, the values in step 3 are in increasing order
from freezer to core. Which means, the core level is a superset of everything
before it. (So if you don't hit the problem with the core level, you won't hit it
in any previous level.)
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists