lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F7AC7DF.3050905@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:20:23 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, stern@...land.harvard.edu, rjw@...k.pl,
	pavel@....cz
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] NMI received for unknown reason 3c on CPU 0, strange
 powersaving mode?

On 04/03/2012 01:20 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:

> Am Montag, 2. April 2012 schrieb Srivatsa S. Bhat:
>> On 03/30/2012 04:34 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Since some time I am seeing things like
>>>
>>> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Mar 30 00:29:30 ...
>>>
>>>  kernel:[49074.294260] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3c on
>>>  CPU 0.
>>>
>>> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Mar 30 00:29:30 ...
>>>
>>>  kernel:[49074.294263] Do you have a strange power saving mode
>>>  enabled?
>>>
>>> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Mar 30 00:29:30 ...
>>>
>>>  kernel:[49074.294264] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
>>>
>>> on resume after in-kernel hibernation.
>>
>> Do you see this after suspend-to-ram too?
>>
>>> I do not see any trace of it in syslog, kern.log or dmesg.
>>>
>>> From the timestemp it seems that these messages are issued shortly
>>> before I send the laptop to hibernation last night.
>>>
>>>
>>> I am using a ThinkPad T520 with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2520M CPU @
>>> 2.50GHz and Sandybridge graphics.
>>>
>>> I am not exactly sure since when it happens, cause I basically
>>> ignored it for quite some time. Might be some 3.2 kernel where it
>>> started, maybe even the first 3.2 kernel I had. Currently I am
>>> using:
>>>
>>> martin@...kaba:~> cat /proc/version
>>> Linux version 3.3.0-trunk-amd64 (Debian 3.3-1~experimental.1)
>>> (debian- kernel@...ts.debian.org) (gcc version 4.6.3 (Debian
>>> 4.6.3-1) ) #1 SMP Thu Mar 22 18:02:10 UTC 2012
>>>
>>> Since I am quite sure I didnĀ“t see this with the first kernel I used
>>> on this machine, which was a 2.6.39 if I remember correctly, I
>>> consider this to be a regression for now.
>>>
>>>
>>> I did not see any other strange effects, only this message.
>>>
>>>
>>> When searching for it I see quite some referencesĀ¹. But what I looked
>>> at seemed to either quite old or different in that the machine was
>>> frozen then.
>>
>> There was once such a bug report and commit 144060fee (perf: Add PM
>> notifiers to fix CPU hotplug races) tried to fix it, however it didn't
>> work out IIRC.
>>
>> Can you please try out the pm-test framework and let us know in which
>> phase this message is encountered?
>> Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
>>
>> 1. Recompile the kernel with CONFIG_PM_DEBUG=y
>> 2. # cat /sys/power/pm_test
>> 3. # echo <value> > /sys/power/pm_test
>>    Use the values from the list given in step 2.
>>    From freezer to core, it is increasing depth of suspend phase.
>> 4. # echo mem > /sys/power/state  (for suspend-to-ram)
>>    or echo disk > /sys/power/state  (for suspend-to-disk)
>>
>> It would be great if you could tell which of the phases (freezer to
>> core) fails.
> 
> Here I have the one from this morning. This time as resume time:
> 
> martin@...kaba:~> 
> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Apr  3 09:10:15 ...
>  kernel:[ 3755.145282] Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 3c on CPU 0.
> 
> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Apr  3 09:10:15 ...
>  kernel:[ 3755.145285] Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled?
> 
> Message from syslogd@...kaba at Apr  3 09:10:15 ...
>  kernel:[ 3755.145286] Dazed and confused, but trying to continue
> 
> 
> And here are the tests - short summary I was not able to reproduce the 
> issue - nothing means that there was no furch NMI message on the Konsole 
> window where it usually appears:
> 
> merkaba:~> cat /sys/power/pm_test 
> [none] core processors platform devices freezer
> merkaba:~> echo "core" > /sys/power/pm_test
> merkaba:~> echo "mem" > /sys/power/state  
> merkaba:~> echo nothing               
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "disk" > /sys/power/state
> merkaba:~> echo nothing
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "processors" > /sys/power/pm_test
> merkaba:~> echo "mem" > /sys/power/state         
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                          
> nothing
> merkaba:~> cat /sys/power/pm_test        
> none core [processors] platform devices freezer
> merkaba:~> echo "disk" > /sys/power/state
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                  
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "platform" > /sys/power/pm_test
> merkaba:~> echo "mem" > /sys/power/state         
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                 
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "disk" > /sys/power/state
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                        
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "devices" > /sys/power/pm_test
> merkaba:~> echo "mem" > /sys/power/state      
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                       
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "disk" > /sys/power/state  
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                  
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "freezer" > /sys/power/pm_test
> merkaba:~> echo "mem" > /sys/power/state      
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                       
> nothing
> merkaba:~> echo "disk" > /sys/power/state
> merkaba:~> echo nothing                  
> nothing
> 
> 
> Now trying a regular hibernation:
> 
> merkaba:~> echo "none" > /sys/power/pm_test
> merkaba:~> cat /sys/power/pm_test
> [none] core processors platform devices freezer
> 
> 
> Nothing.
> 
> 
> Now trying a regular hibernation with some minutes downtime and
> unplugging the power from the laptop.
> 
> 
> Nothing as well.
> 
> 
> Now I am puzzled.
> 
> 
> Maybe its the switch from minidock to no dock and vice versa?
> 


Oh.. so you couldn't reproduce the problem.. 
Can you try with the original setup (minidock?) with which you found the
issue during hibernation and see what pm_test has to say in that case?

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ