[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F7B1174.5070300@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:04:20 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, plagnioj@...osoft.com
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
ludovic.desroches@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, olof@...om.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] USB: ohci-at91: change maximum number of ports
On 04/03/2012 04:11 PM, Alan Stern :
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>
>> Change number of ports to 3 for newer SoCs. Modify pdata structure
>> and ohci-at91 code that was dealing with ports information and check
>> of port indexes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
>
> Did you run this patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl? I have the
> feeling that it might complain about some of the changes.
Yes, definitively.
I can modify the patch to comply with error issued by checkpatch.pl: several are
due to a bad replacement of previous code with my regular expression but others
where existing before my modifications.
So what do you think about:
- addressing all style errors in this patch (to prevent carrying them)
- merging this one and the following patch:
"[PATCH v2 07/13] USB: ohci-at91: coding style modifications with one-line ifs
- posting a v3 of this patch only if you agree on this...
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists