| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1204031125060.1537-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:25:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> cc: plagnioj@...osoft.com, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>, <olof@...om.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] USB: ohci-at91: change maximum number of ports On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > Did you run this patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl? I have the > > feeling that it might complain about some of the changes. > > Yes, definitively. > > I can modify the patch to comply with error issued by checkpatch.pl: several are > due to a bad replacement of previous code with my regular expression but others > where existing before my modifications. > So what do you think about: > - addressing all style errors in this patch (to prevent carrying them) > - merging this one and the following patch: > "[PATCH v2 07/13] USB: ohci-at91: coding style modifications with one-line ifs > - posting a v3 of this patch only if you agree on this... Sure, go ahead. Aside from this minor issue I didn't notice anything objectionable in the patch series. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists