linux-kernel - RE: [RFC][PATCH] avoid swapping out with swappiness==0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:15:30 -0400
From:	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
To:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"jweiner@...hat.com" <jweiner@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
	"lwoodman@...hat.com" <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
	"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH] avoid swapping out with swappiness==0

On 04/03/2012 07:25 AM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 07:10 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> 2012/3/30 Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>:
>>> Hello Kosaki-san,
>>>
>>> On 03/07/2012 01:18 PM, Satoru Moriya wrote:
>>>> On 03/07/2012 12:19 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>>>> Thank you. I brought back to memory it. Unfortunately DB folks are
>>>>> still mainly using RHEL5 generation distros. At that time,
>>>>> swapiness=0 doesn't mean disabling swap.
>>>>>
>>>>> They want, "don't swap as far as kernel has any file cache page". but
>>>>> linux don't have such feature. then they used swappiness for emulate
>>>>> it. So, I think this patch clearly make userland harm. Because of, we
>>>>> don't have an alternative way.
>>>
>>> As I wrote in the previous mail(see below), with this patch
>>> the kernel begins to swap out when the sum of free pages and
>>> filebacked pages reduces less than watermark_high.
>
> Actually, this is true only for global reclaims. Reclaims in cgroup can fail
> in this case.

Right.
As long as we consider RHEL5 users above, I believe they don't care
about cgroup case.

>>>
>>> So the kernel reclaims pages like following.
>>>
>>> nr_free + nr_filebacked >= watermark_high: reclaim only filebacked pages
>>> nr_free + nr_filebacked <  watermark_high: reclaim only anonymous pages

I made a tiny mistake.
Correct one is following ;p

nr_free + nr_filebacked >  watermark_high: reclaim only filebacked pages
nr_free + nr_filebacked <= watermark_high: reclaim only anonymous pages

>> How?
>
> get_scan_count() checks that case explicitly:
>
>        if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
>                free  = zone_page_state(mz->zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
>                /* If we have very few page cache pages,
>                   force-scan anon pages. */
>                if (unlikely(file + free <= high_wmark_pages(mz->zone))) {
>                        fraction[0] = 1;
>                        fraction[1] = 0;
>                        denominator = 1;
>                        goto out;
>                }
>        }

Regards,
Satoru--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/