linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 3/3] misc: add support for bmp18x chips to the bmp085 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:11:17 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Eric Andersson <eric.andersson@...xphere.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, zhengguang.guo@...ch-sensortec.com,
	peter.moeller@...bosch.com, stefan.nilsson@...xphere.com,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 3/3] misc: add support for bmp18x chips to the bmp085
 driver

On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 08:00:33PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 April 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > +static const struct of_device_id bmp085_of_match[] = {
> > > +     { .compatible = "bosch-sensortec,bmp085", },

> > Traditionally the stock ticker symbol would be used.

> I though about commenting on that as well, but since Bosch is a foundation
> and not publically traded, that would be hard to accomplish. Is there
> an official fallback for companies that don't have a stock ticker symbol?

Guess we should ask the DT people...  I mostly just noticed that the
name appeared somewhat verbose - perhaps just plain "bosch" if there's
not a better abbrevation?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)