[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1333660563.8861.3.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 23:16:03 +0200
From: Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@...base.at>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
leigh123linux@...glemail.com, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use correct byte-sized register constraint in
__xchg_op()
Hi Josh,
You are right, this bug also affects 3.3 and IMO should be fixed there,
too!
-Thomas
Am Donnerstag, den 05.04.2012, 16:27 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> >> x86-64 can access the low half of any register, but i386 can only do
> >> it with a subset of registers. 'r' causes compilation failures on i386,
> >> but 'q' expresses the constraint properly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
> >> Reported-by: Leigh Scott <leigh123linux@...glemail.com>
> >> Tested-by: Thomas Reitmayr <treitmayr@...base.at>
> >
> > This should be CC'd to stable, given the bug shows up in 3.3, right?
>
> Er.. this patch seems to have been lost in limbo. Is anyone following
> up on it?
>
> josh
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists