[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F7EB406.5020703@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:14:46 +0400
From: Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
linux-man@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hrtimers: system-wide and per-task hrtimer slacks
On 04/05/2012 04:10 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well.. there are some back-incompatibilities here.
> prctl(PR_SET_TIMERSLACK, -1) used to restore current's slack setting to
> whatever-we-inherited-at-fork, but that has been removed. What are the
> implications of this, and did we need to do it?
It seems you're looking at the previous version of this patch
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/20/55). Latest proposal is
http://lwn.net/Articles/484162/, which defines PR_SET_TIMERSLACK
action as:
...
case PR_SET_TIMERSLACK:
if (arg2 <= 0)
current->timer_slack_ns =
default_timer_slack_ns;
else if (arg2 <= HRTIMER_MAX_SLACK)
current->timer_slack_ns = arg2;
else
error = -EINVAL;
break;
...
> If we do make changes in this area then the prctl manpage should be
> updated, please. And if
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/msg01149.html represents the
> current state of that manpage then it should be updated anyway - that
> entry doesn't say anything about the (arg2<= 0) case.
I sent a patch for man pages too, it should be one of the recent posts
at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-man/index.html.
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists