[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <588810225.17969.1333703883646.JavaMail.www@wwinf1g24>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:18:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pascal Chapperon <pascal.chapperon@...adoo.fr>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...oraproject.org
Subject: Re: RCU related performance regression in 3.3
> Message du 05/04/12 16:40
> De : "Paul E. McKenney"
> A : "Pascal CHAPPERON"
> Copie à : "Josh Boyer" , linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...oraproject.org
> Objet : Re: RCU related performance regression in 3.3
>
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 04:15:33PM +0200, Pascal CHAPPERON wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I didn't notice any significant slowdown while the system is up and running.
A full kernel compilation (make -j 16) takes 14mn with both 3.2.10 and 3.3.0.
>
> OK, so the natural approach is to disable CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ at
> boot time. Unfortunately, you appear to need it to remain disabled
> through at least filesystem mounting, which if I understand correctly
> happens long after system_state gets set to SYSTEM_RUNNING.
>
In fact, I need it to remain disable until all the systemd units are completed.
Some units, such as NetworkManager can take longer time to complete with
RCU_FAST_NO_HZ enabled.
And i need it to be disabled at shutdown, as umounting cgroups, sysfs, etc.
plus old-root mounting can take one plain second for each umounting.
> If RCU has some way to find out when init is complete, I can easily
> make it so that CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ optimizes for speed during boot
> and energy efficiency during runtime.
>
I said that I didn't noticed significant slowdown during runtime, but my
laptop usage is basic. Some specific tasks similar to systemd may
perhaps be impacted by this feature.
I can test a task/program that could stress RCU_FAST_NO_HZ if any ?
> One thing I could easily do would be to provide a sysfs parameter or
> some such that allows the boot process to enable energy-efficiency
> mode at runtime. I would much prefer to make this automatic, though.
>
So the feature is disabled until you trigger a sysfs parameter, and can be
disabled before shutdown ? It would be fair, at least for hardware like my
own.
> Other thoughts?
>
Do you think that the culprit is a buggy hardware in my laptop, or the
number of cpu/threads ?
> Thanx, Paul
>
Resent in plain text because rejected. Sorry, i forgot the rules.
Pascal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists