[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120408231841.42e28867@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 23:18:41 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: deprecating/removing the legacy mode of devpts
> > As such, I would like to suggest the following:
> >
> > 1. For 3.5, add this to feature-removal.txt.
> > 2. For 3.6, remove CONFIG_DEVPTS_MULTIPLE_INSTANCES as a configuration
> > option, and printk a warning if devpts is mounted without the
> > "newinstance" option.
> > 3. For 3.9 remove the legacy support including support for a ptmx node
> > outside the devpts filesystem.
Ok I'm putting my tty maintainers hat on at this point because nobody
seems to be listening
I'm NAKking this change, I'm NAKking the feature-removal change.
If you want this to change convince the distributions there is a point in
supporting it. This is the *wrong* forum to force a cornercase feature
onto a bazillion users, and the wrong way to strongarm maintainers of the
relevant user space.
If udev has a problem handling it nicely because of the way the link is
generated then *fix that problem* so udev automatically gets both cases
right. If need be we can add more messages to udev to tell it what is
expected and what devtmpfs should produce.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists