[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F832ABF.4060509@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:30:23 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux390@...ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/69] TTY: con3215, remove tasklet for tty_wakeup
On 04/09/2012 08:27 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 04/03/2012 07:42 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:54:09PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>> tty_wakeup is safe to be called from all contexts. No need to schedule
>>>> a tasklet for that. Let us call it directly like in other drivers.
>>>>
>>>> And delete the tasklet completely.
>>>
>>> Your patch actually reverts Martin's recent commit 656d912537
>>> "[S390] 3215 deadlock with tty_wakeup".
>>> I'm quite sure the reason for the deadlock still exists.
>>> Unfortunately the commit doesn't contain the call chain that
>>> led to fix.
>>
>> Ok, I would really appreciate the trace.
>>
>> If this is really an issue, we should provide a helper in the TTY layer
>> like tty_schedule_wakeup.
>
> Jiri, should I not apply this patch?
Yes, please skip it until this is sorted out. And also the other con3215
patches if they don't apply cleanly now.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists