[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120410172828.GI21801@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:28:28 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] block: Change default IO scheduler to deadline
except SATA
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:13:07PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
[..]
> > So we are back to the question of can scsi devices find out if a Lun
> > is backed by single disk or multiple disks.
>
> I'm not aware of any discrete attribute (comparable to 'rotational'
> flag) that SCSI devices will advertise that indicates "I'm a raid
> array".
>
> That said, we can have a _very_ good hint that a SCSI device is a raid array if:
>
> 1) optimal_io_size is not zero, minimum_io_size is not equal to
> optimal_io_size, and optimal_io_size is a multiple of minimum_io_size
>
> 2) WCE=0 (higher-end arrays with a writeback cache)
>
> Determining 1 could be enough, we should probably ignore 2 as it isn't
> an absolute indication that a device is composed of multiple devices
> (especially not if considered independently of 1).
Umm..., somehow relying on optimal_io_size != minimum_io_size sounds odd
to me (assuming it works).
I checked bunch of Luns exported to me and all of them have
optimal_io_size=0.
I have few FC Luns exported from two array vendors. I have few iscsi Luns
exported from two separate vendors and all these luns have
optimal_io_size=0.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists