linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] block: Change default IO scheduler to deadline except SATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120410174036.GA4178@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:40:36 -0400
From:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] block: Change default IO scheduler to deadline
 except SATA

On Tue, Apr 10 2012 at  1:28pm -0400,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:13:07PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> 
> [..]
> > > So we are back to the question of can scsi devices find out if a Lun
> > > is backed by single disk or multiple disks.
> > 
> > I'm not aware of any discrete attribute (comparable to 'rotational'
> > flag) that SCSI devices will advertise that indicates "I'm a raid
> > array".
> > 
> > That said, we can have a _very_ good hint that a SCSI device is a raid array if:
> > 
> > 1) optimal_io_size is not zero, minimum_io_size is not equal to
> > optimal_io_size, and optimal_io_size is a multiple of minimum_io_size
> > 
> > 2) WCE=0 (higher-end arrays with a writeback cache)
> > 
> > Determining 1 could be enough, we should probably ignore 2 as it isn't
> > an absolute indication that a device is composed of multiple devices
> > (especially not if considered independently of 1).
> 
> Umm..., somehow relying on optimal_io_size != minimum_io_size sounds odd
> to me (assuming it works).
> 
> I checked bunch of Luns exported to me and all of them have
> optimal_io_size=0.

As I said above, this would only apply if "optimal_io_size is not zero, ..."

> I have few FC Luns exported from two array vendors. I have few iscsi Luns
> exported from two separate vendors and all these luns have
> optimal_io_size=0.

Seems all those LUNs haven't exported their limits via BLOCK LIMITS VPD.
But more recent firmware could rectify that.

Anyway, there is no one size fits all here, sorry to disappoint you!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/