[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8659DA.4030305@st.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:58:10 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: "arnd.bergmann@...aro.org" <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] clk: core: correct clk_set_rate kerneldoc
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> - * If clk has the CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag set and it is enabled this call
> - * will fail; only when the clk is disabled will it be able to change
> - * its rate.
Why is CLK_SET_RATE_GATE removed? I already sent a patch to fix clk_set_rate()
for this. And i think it should be required.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists