[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8672CC.2040500@st.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:44:36 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: "arnd.bergmann@...aro.org" <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] clk: core: remove dead code paths
On 4/12/2012 6:32 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 3ed36d3..4daacf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static int __init clk_debug_init(void)
> late_initcall(clk_debug_init);
> #else
> static inline int clk_debug_register(struct clk *clk) { return 0; }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG */
> +#endif
Why is this updated? Isn't this considered good practice anymore?
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists