[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204121304050.29473@utopia.booyaka.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:15:16 -0600 (MDT)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
cc: "Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>, "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
"V, Aneesh" <aneesh@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"mgreer@...malcreek.com" <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Add TI EMIF SDRAM controller driver
Hi BenoƮt,
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> The LPDDR2 spec does consider as well NVM (Non Volatile Memory), so I think we
> should stick to driver/memory for EMIF.
Hmm good point!
> > So perhaps something like drivers/memory/dram/ for the SDRAM controllers,
> > and maybe drivers/memory/ for the GPMC?
>
> In fact Felipe was considering something else for that kind of general purpose
> bus driver like GMPC, C2C and LLI...
>
> ... But I do not remember the name :-)
It would be nice if we could separate IP blocks that can drive an Ethernet
controller or modem chip from the DRAM controllers; they are quite
different beasts from a common API standpoint.
- Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists