[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F872BED.7000703@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:24:29 +0200
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
CC: "Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@...com>, "Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
"V, Aneesh" <aneesh@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"mgreer@...malcreek.com" <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Add TI EMIF SDRAM controller driver
On 4/12/2012 9:15 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi BenoƮt,
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
>
>> The LPDDR2 spec does consider as well NVM (Non Volatile Memory), so I think we
>> should stick to driver/memory for EMIF.
>
> Hmm good point!
>
>>> So perhaps something like drivers/memory/dram/ for the SDRAM controllers,
>>> and maybe drivers/memory/ for the GPMC?
>>
>> In fact Felipe was considering something else for that kind of general purpose
>> bus driver like GMPC, C2C and LLI...
>>
>> ... But I do not remember the name :-)
>
> It would be nice if we could separate IP blocks that can drive an Ethernet
> controller or modem chip from the DRAM controllers; they are quite
> different beasts from a common API standpoint.
Yep, fully agree. In fact Felipe's suggestion was something like
drivers/ocd for off-chip devices, but maybe something like drivers/gpbus
will highlight a little bit more the bus controller aspect of such driver.
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists