[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120413120232.GA27179@umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:02:32 -0400
From: Jim Rees <rees@...ch.edu>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pstaubach@...grid.com,
miklos@...redi.hu, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
michael.brantley@...haw.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] vfs: make fstatat retry on ESTALE errors from
getattr call
Jeff Layton wrote:
+retry:
error = user_path_at(dfd, filename, lookup_flags, &path);
if (error)
goto out;
error = vfs_getattr(path.mnt, path.dentry, stat);
+ should_retry = error == -ESTALE ? retry_estale(path.dentry) : false;
path_put(&path);
+ if (should_retry) {
+ lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_REVAL;
+ goto retry;
+ }
out:
return error;
}
This is starting to look like FORTRAN. Maybe turn this into a "do while"?
Then you could make the "goto out" into a break and get rid of them both.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists