[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120413185838.GC25091@elgon.mountain>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:58:38 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Renzelmann <mjr@...wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC] workqueue: do a sanity check on new work
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:39:13AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Dan.
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > There may be a better way to do this. If someone tries to call
> > shedule_work() on a work_struck before doing an INIT_WORK() then we
> > hit the BUG_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry)) in __queue_work() and hang.
> > Instead of that, we could just print a stack dump and return.
>
> Hmmm... why not just change the BUG_ON() in __queue_work() to "if
> (WARN_ON()) return;"?
>
Good point. I'll do that.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists