| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <201204132141.58063.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:41:57 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCIe: Add PCIe runtime D3cold support
Hi,
On Friday, April 13, 2012, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch adds PCIe runtime D3cold support, namely cut power supply for functions
> beneath a PCIe port when they all have entered D3. A device in D3cold can only
> generate wake event through the WAKE# pin. Because we can not access to a device's
> configure space while it's in D3cold, pme_poll is disabled for devices in D3cold.
>
> Any comment will be appreciated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> index 0f150f2..e210e8cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
> [PCI_D1] = ACPI_STATE_D1,
> [PCI_D2] = ACPI_STATE_D2,
> [PCI_D3hot] = ACPI_STATE_D3,
> - [PCI_D3cold] = ACPI_STATE_D3
> + [PCI_D3cold] = ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD
> };
> int error = -EINVAL;
>
Please don't use that ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD thing, it's not defined correctly.
We should define ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD == ACPI_STATE_D3 and add ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT
instead. I'll prepare a patch for that over the weekend if no one has done
that already.
> @@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static void acpi_pci_propagate_run_wake(struct pci_bus *bus, bool enable)
>
> static int acpi_pci_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
> {
> - if (dev->pme_interrupt)
> + /* PME interrupt isn't available in the D3cold case */
> + if (dev->pme_interrupt && !dev->runtime_d3cold)
This whole thing is wrong. First off, I don't think that the runtime_d3cold
flag makes any sense. We already cover that in dev->pme_support.
Second, pme_interrupt means that the _root_ _port_, not the device itself will
trigger an interrupt whenever the device sends the PME message to it (which
very well may happen for a device in D3_cold woken up by an external signal).
> return 0;
>
> if (!acpi_pm_device_run_wake(&dev->dev, enable))
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 8156744..bc16869 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -731,8 +731,8 @@ int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
> int error;
>
Guys, please. Never, _ever_, touch pci_set_power_state() without discussing
your ideas with someone who knows how it works and _why_ it works this way.
The problem here is that you can't program a PCI device into D3_cold, so it
doesn't even make sense to have a helper for that.
> /* bound the state we're entering */
> - if (state > PCI_D3hot)
> - state = PCI_D3hot;
> + if (state > PCI_D3cold)
> + state = PCI_D3cold;
> else if (state < PCI_D0)
> state = PCI_D0;
> else if ((state == PCI_D1 || state == PCI_D2) && pci_no_d1d2(dev))
> @@ -750,7 +750,8 @@ int pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
> if (state == PCI_D3hot && (dev->dev_flags & PCI_DEV_FLAGS_NO_D3))
> return 0;
>
> - error = pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, state);
> + error = pci_raw_set_power_state(dev, state > PCI_D3hot ?
> + PCI_D3hot : state);
>
> if (!__pci_complete_power_transition(dev, state))
> error = 0;
> @@ -1482,6 +1483,17 @@ bool pci_pme_capable(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
> return !!(dev->pme_support & (1 << state));
> }
>
> +static void pci_pme_poll_wakeup(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *bridge = dev->bus->self;
> +
> + /* don't poll the pme bit if parent is in low power state */
> + if (bridge && bridge->current_state != PCI_D0)
> + return;
> +
> + pci_pme_wakeup(dev, NULL);
> +}
This one actually makes some sense, although it might be better to put the
test into pci_pme_wakeup() itself.
> +
> static void pci_pme_list_scan(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct pci_pme_device *pme_dev, *n;
> @@ -1490,7 +1502,7 @@ static void pci_pme_list_scan(struct work_struct *work)
> if (!list_empty(&pci_pme_list)) {
> list_for_each_entry_safe(pme_dev, n, &pci_pme_list, list) {
> if (pme_dev->dev->pme_poll) {
> - pci_pme_wakeup(pme_dev->dev, NULL);
> + pci_pme_poll_wakeup(pme_dev->dev);
> } else {
> list_del(&pme_dev->list);
> kfree(pme_dev);
> @@ -1608,6 +1620,10 @@ int __pci_enable_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state,
> if (enable) {
> int error;
>
> + if (runtime && state >= PCI_D3cold)
> + dev->runtime_d3cold = true;
> + else
> + dev->runtime_d3cold = false;
> if (pci_pme_capable(dev, state))
> pci_pme_active(dev, true);
> else
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> index e0610bd..d66b7e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/pm.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/pcieport_if.h>
> #include <linux/aer.h>
> #include <linux/dmi.h>
> #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>
> #include "portdrv.h"
> #include "aer/aerdrv.h"
> @@ -99,6 +101,25 @@ static int pcie_port_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int pcie_port_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> + pci_save_state(pdev);
Are you sure this is sufficient?
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pcie_port_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> + pci_restore_state(pdev);
> + if (pdev->runtime_d3cold)
> + msleep(100);
What's _that_ supposed to do?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct dev_pm_ops pcie_portdrv_pm_ops = {
> .suspend = pcie_port_device_suspend,
> .resume = pcie_port_device_resume,
> @@ -107,6 +128,8 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops pcie_portdrv_pm_ops = {
> .poweroff = pcie_port_device_suspend,
> .restore = pcie_port_device_resume,
> .resume_noirq = pcie_port_resume_noirq,
> + .runtime_suspend = pcie_port_runtime_suspend,
> + .runtime_resume = pcie_port_runtime_resume,
> };
>
> #define PCIE_PORTDRV_PM_OPS (&pcie_portdrv_pm_ops)
> @@ -144,12 +167,14 @@ static int __devinit pcie_portdrv_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> return status;
>
> pci_save_state(dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&dev->dev);
What's the purpose of this?
> return 0;
> }
>
> static void pcie_portdrv_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&dev->dev);
> pcie_port_device_remove(dev);
> pci_disable_device(dev);
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index e444f5b..b41d9a1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
> unsigned int no_d1d2:1; /* Only allow D0 and D3 */
> unsigned int mmio_always_on:1; /* disallow turning off io/mem
> decoding during bar sizing */
> + unsigned int runtime_d3cold:1;
> unsigned int wakeup_prepared:1;
> unsigned int d3_delay; /* D3->D0 transition time in ms */
OK
So now please tell me what exactly you want to achieve and why you want to do
that in the first place.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists