[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120413230525.GA13995@burratino>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:05:25 -0500
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Adrian Chadd <adrian@...ebsd.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sergio Correia <lists@...e.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@....qualcomm.com>,
"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> If you do not like to wait for Linus and Greg, you simply have to derive
>> an own kernel which additionally contains your preferred fixes.
>
> Yes, because clearly everybody thinks the process is perfect, and
> criticizing it is heresy.
Close. Not everyone. For example, you do not think the process is
perfect.
I don't think Stefan meant the above as tongue-in-cheek, for what it's
worth. Another stable kernel with different rules really would be an
interesting exercise, and would probably fulfill a need for a certain
audience.
It's not like nobody does that already, anyway. For example, I hear
Fedora has a kernel that they maintain well for a different audience,
using different rules.
Ciao,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists