[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyDy6VHtZ=SmXfn-AHT0QU8LV69U5NECGLA9pXg4Q=aZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:32:51 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] task_work_add (was: task_work_queue)
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Changes based on review from Andrew:
>
> - s/task_work_queue/task_work_add/
>
> - don't create a secret dependency upon task_work.h
> including sched.h in tracehook.h and keys/internal.h
>
> - add more includes into task_work.[ch] to not rely
> on "sched.h includes everything"
I thought based on Andrew's comments that you were going to remove the
extra code to do FIFO for no obvious reason. Apparently nothing
actually wanted/needed it, so why do it?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists