[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120414023420.GQ6589@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:34:20 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: osd_req_encode_op() breakage?
static void osd_req_encode_op(struct ceph_osd_request *req,
struct ceph_osd_op *dst,
struct ceph_osd_req_op *src)
{
dst->op = cpu_to_le16(src->op);
switch (dst->op) {
case CEPH_OSD_OP_READ:
case CEPH_OSD_OP_WRITE:
is an interesting thing to say, seeing that CEPH_OSD_OP_READ et.al. are
all host-endian... Should that be "switch (src->op)" instead? AFAICS,
that sucker had appeared in that form back in
commit 68b4476b0bc13fef18266b4140309a30e86739d2
Author: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@...newdream.net>
Date: Tue Apr 6 15:01:27 2010 -0700
ceph: messenger and osdc changes for rbd
and it seems to be broken on big-endian hosts. Doesn't look like a misspelled
le16_to_cpu() either, since dst->op ends up going on the wire...
I'm really mystified by that - it looks like it must've shown up immediately
on big-endian hosts; it's not like it was an obscure codepath, after all...
Comments?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists