[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F8C4818.8070603@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:26:00 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@....org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ker.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
On 16/04/12 17:05, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel [mailto:david.vrabel@...rix.com]
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
>
> Nacked-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
Fair enough,
> [A stable clock] should be true for Xen 4.0+ (but not for pre-Xen-4.0).
The original customer problem is on a host with Xen 3.4. What do you
recommend for Linux guests running such hosts?
> In fact, it might be wise for a Xen-savvy kernel to check to see
> if it is running on Xen-4.0+ and, if so, force clocksource=tsc
> and tsc=reliable.
So, should the xen clocksource do:
if Xen 4.0+
clock is stable, use rdtsc only.
else
clock is unstable, use existing pvclock implementation.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists