[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMP44s1o9kBp8672oBnvna+qH4WpqSqGUsyNpc_C74cfNYcX_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:11:05 +0300
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net>,
linux-wireless Mailing List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] [ 00/78] 3.3.2-stable review
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Just one minor correction in this looney email thread:
>
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 01:53:22AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> v3.3.x on the other hand are *not* stable. They contain patches
>> backported from v3.4, but nobody guarantees they will work. There was
>> no v3.3.1-rc1, so the first time the patches compromising v3.3.1 were
>> generally tested together is in v3.3.1, at which point if somebody
>> finds issues, it's too late; bad patches are *not* going to be removed
>> in v3.3.2.
>
> Of course there was a 3.3.1-rc1, see the linux-kernel archives for the
> announcemen and the individual patches. kernel.org has the large patch
> itself if you like that format instead.
I don't see it here:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=tags
If you really want people to try it, why not tag it?
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists