linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] seccomp: ignore secure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120417084707.318091fd28f6dd306e891195@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:47:07 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc:	jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: ignore secure_computing return values

Hi Will,

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:41 -0500 Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Unless an architecture selects CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER, it
> is not required to respect the return value from secure_computing().
> 
> This change matches https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/14 exactly except
> that it applies cleanly to security-next.  Because there is no
> other difference than the alignment, I've kept Signed-off-by intact.

Given that, I think you should have kept the authorship (i.e. put

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>

at the top of the patch).  Also, you should probably mention the compile
error that this fixes in the commit message as well.

But otherwise, thanks for submitting this.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped