[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABqD9hb7BcjFiYSKThjF8AH6uKw56ZEJHmuJ9zt=c59Rc=3RSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:57:40 -0500
From: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: ignore secure_computing return values
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:41 -0500 Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>> Unless an architecture selects CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER, it
>> is not required to respect the return value from secure_computing().
>>
>> This change matches https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/14 exactly except
>> that it applies cleanly to security-next. Because there is no
>> other difference than the alignment, I've kept Signed-off-by intact.
>
> Given that, I think you should have kept the authorship (i.e. put
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
No problem - happy to resend! I manually created the patch (grep; vi)
but and the result was identical :)
> at the top of the patch). Also, you should probably mention the compile
> error that this fixes in the commit message as well.
I'll fix it and resend!
> But otherwise, thanks for submitting this.
Didn't mean to obscure authorship or the details.
Cheers!
will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists