| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:57:40 -0500 From: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: ignore secure_computing return values On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi Will, > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:41 -0500 Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> wrote: >> >> Unless an architecture selects CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER, it >> is not required to respect the return value from secure_computing(). >> >> This change matches https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/14 exactly except >> that it applies cleanly to security-next. Because there is no >> other difference than the alignment, I've kept Signed-off-by intact. > > Given that, I think you should have kept the authorship (i.e. put > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> No problem - happy to resend! I manually created the patch (grep; vi) but and the result was identical :) > at the top of the patch). Also, you should probably mention the compile > error that this fixes in the commit message as well. I'll fix it and resend! > But otherwise, thanks for submitting this. Didn't mean to obscure authorship or the details. Cheers! will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists