[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120417135726.05de2546.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:57:26 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] mm/hugetlb: fix warning in
alloc_huge_page/dequeue_huge_page_vma
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:28:19 +0400
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> This patch fixes gcc warning (and bug?) introduced in linux-next commit cc9a6c877
> ("cpuset: mm: reduce large amounts of memory barrier related damage v3")
>
> Local variable "page" can be uninitialized if nodemask from vma policy does not
> intersects with nodemask from cpuset. Even if it wouldn't happens it's better to
> initialize this variable explicitly than to introduce kernel oops on weird corner case.
>
> mm/hugetlb.c: In function ___alloc_huge_page___:
> mm/hugetlb.c:1135:5: warning: ___page___ may be used uninitialized in this function
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address, int avoid_reserve)
> {
> - struct page *page;
> + struct page *page = NULL;
> struct mempolicy *mpol;
> nodemask_t *nodemask;
> struct zonelist *zonelist;
hm, that's a pretty blatant use-uninitialised bug. I wonder why so few
gcc versions report it. Mine doesn't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists