[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120418144043.GH1505@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:40:44 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemleak: do not leak object after tree insertion
error (v2, fixed)
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:06:56AM +0100, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> [PATCH] kmemleak: do not leak object after tree insertion error
>
> In case when tree insertion fails due to already existing object
> error, pointer to allocated object gets lost due to lookup_object()
> overwrite. Free allocated object and return the existing one,
> obtained from lookup_object().
We really need to return NULL if the tree insertion fails as kmemleak is
disabled in this case (fatal condition for kmemleak). So we could just
call kmem_cache_free(object_cache, object) in the 'if' block.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists