[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADRPPNQRLyZK-zjeLUYCZtLe+8HhFzFALCMyPeaCGX+buaf+ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:44:16 +0800
From: Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>,
Zhao Chenhui-B35336 <B35336@...escale.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: avoid I2C abnormal after resuming from deep sleep
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> We certainly don't want the policy to be against the common practice
>> of the community. If it is we can consider changing our policy.
>
> Nice, thanks for being open to discussion!
>
>> However I can't find a clear message stating the consensus of what the
>> Linux kernel community think of adding copyright claims. I even found
>
> Well, what I know, the consensus is "common sense". What is obviously
> not "clear" in a way you could write it down. At least, Ben agrees.
>
We do honor your point and can be flexible on this. I'm just not sure
if our policy need to be changed to align with the common sense of the
community.
>> some message that encourage adding copyright to maintain the GPL
>> license.
>
> I am interested. Do you have a link?
Well. I can't find the exact message. I remember it is from an email
discussion in which someone said by encouraging contributors to add
copyright claims to a file it would be clear that no one can change
the license of the file away from GPL.
- Leo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists