linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: avoid I2C abnormal after resuming from deep sleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120418103334.GD2232@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:33:34 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Li Yang-R58472 <r58472@...escale.com>
Cc:	Zhao Chenhui-B35336 <B35336@...escale.com>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-mpc: avoid I2C abnormal after resuming from deep
 sleep

Hi,

> We certainly don't want the policy to be against the common practice
> of the community.  If it is we can consider changing our policy.

Nice, thanks for being open to discussion!

> However I can't find a clear message stating the consensus of what the
> Linux kernel community think of adding copyright claims.  I even found

Well, what I know, the consensus is "common sense". What is obviously
not "clear" in a way you could write it down. At least, Ben agrees.

> some message that encourage adding copyright to maintain the GPL
> license.

I am interested. Do you have a link?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)