[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F902858.9040905@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:59:36 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>, shawn.guo@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: select CLKDEV_LOOKUP for COMMON_CLK
On 04/18/2012 02:07 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:13:49PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
>>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>
>>> Using the common clock infrastructure without the common clkdev code makes
>>> little sense, so select CLKDEV_LOOKUP for COMMON_CLK.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>>> index 165e1fe..f05a60d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
>>> config COMMON_CLK
>>> bool
>>> select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
>>> + select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
>>> ---help---
>>> The common clock framework is a single definition of struct
>>> clk, useful across many platforms, as well as an
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I agree that the common clk framework is not particularly useful
>> without clkdev. However the core code has no dependency on clkdev.
>> Why not just select it from an arch Kconfig, or even make it a
>> dependency based on your own platform clock data/code?
>
> Selecting it from COMMON_CLK means that the compiler/linker will point
> everybody trying to implement it without CLKDEV into the right
> direction.
Right. That was part of my rationale as well.
The DT clock support is dependent on both options, so without this patch
we'll have to add an otherwise unneeded OF_CLOCK option to select both.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists