[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJOA=zNwueCeSjT2F-M1+Ffu49t5tMBow=8baGrvZdGjrUCMrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:01:15 -0700
From: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>, shawn.guo@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: select CLKDEV_LOOKUP for COMMON_CLK
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> On 04/18/2012 02:07 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:13:49PM -0700, Turquette, Mike wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>>
>>>> Using the common clock infrastructure without the common clkdev code makes
>>>> little sense, so select CLKDEV_LOOKUP for COMMON_CLK.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/clk/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>>>> index 165e1fe..f05a60d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config HAVE_MACH_CLKDEV
>>>> config COMMON_CLK
>>>> bool
>>>> select HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
>>>> + select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
>>>> ---help---
>>>> The common clock framework is a single definition of struct
>>>> clk, useful across many platforms, as well as an
>>>
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> I agree that the common clk framework is not particularly useful
>>> without clkdev. However the core code has no dependency on clkdev.
>>> Why not just select it from an arch Kconfig, or even make it a
>>> dependency based on your own platform clock data/code?
>>
>> Selecting it from COMMON_CLK means that the compiler/linker will point
>> everybody trying to implement it without CLKDEV into the right
>> direction.
>
> Right. That was part of my rationale as well.
>
> The DT clock support is dependent on both options, so without this patch
> we'll have to add an otherwise unneeded OF_CLOCK option to select both.
Ok. I'll take this into my -next branch.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists