linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: Add device tree support to i2c-pnx.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:28:11 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, vitalywool@...il.com,
	khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, arm@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kevin.wells@....com,
	srinivas.bakki@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: Add device tree support to i2c-pnx.c


> Another solution would be to not use timeout with the dt enabled
> i2c-pnx for now (using the hard coded default timeout as the current
> i2c-pnx.c does) and possibly introduce the (anyway optional) "timeout"
> later.

Yeah, let's do it like this.

> Interesting! When the documentation is outdated - how does the parser
> actually decide between hex (e.g. regs/addresses) and dec (e.g.
> clock-frequency) in the absence of "0x"?

Are there regs without 0x?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)