[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120420072811.GA9769@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:28:11 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, vitalywool@...il.com,
khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, arm@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kevin.wells@....com,
srinivas.bakki@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] i2c: Add device tree support to i2c-pnx.c
> Another solution would be to not use timeout with the dt enabled
> i2c-pnx for now (using the hard coded default timeout as the current
> i2c-pnx.c does) and possibly introduce the (anyway optional) "timeout"
> later.
Yeah, let's do it like this.
> Interesting! When the documentation is outdated - how does the parser
> actually decide between hex (e.g. regs/addresses) and dec (e.g.
> clock-frequency) in the absence of "0x"?
Are there regs without 0x?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists