[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120420081953.GJ7505@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:19:54 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmsplice: relax alignement requirements for
SPLICE_F_GIFT
On Wed, Apr 04 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> It seems there is no fundamental reason to limit vmsplice()
> SPLICE_F_GIFT to page aligned chunks.
>
> All helpers are prepared to cope with offsets in page.
>
> This limitation makes vmsplice() API very impractical in the zero-copy
> land.
Sorry for the slow reply on this one. It's been a long time since I
wrote that code... If I recall correctly, the reason it currently
requires alignment, is that a gifted page is no longer yours, by
definition. So the alignment check was to ensure that we gift full
pages. But if the caller screws that up, I guess it's the callers
problem and it's a shame to limit the API in this way.
I will apply it for 3.5.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists