[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1334910900.2395.229.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:35:00 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmsplice: relax alignement requirements for
SPLICE_F_GIFT
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 10:19 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > It seems there is no fundamental reason to limit vmsplice()
> > SPLICE_F_GIFT to page aligned chunks.
> >
> > All helpers are prepared to cope with offsets in page.
> >
> > This limitation makes vmsplice() API very impractical in the zero-copy
> > land.
>
> Sorry for the slow reply on this one. It's been a long time since I
> wrote that code... If I recall correctly, the reason it currently
> requires alignment, is that a gifted page is no longer yours, by
> definition. So the alignment check was to ensure that we gift full
> pages. But if the caller screws that up, I guess it's the callers
> problem and it's a shame to limit the API in this way.
>
> I will apply it for 3.5.
>
Thanks Jens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists