[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120420060101.GA16563@zhy>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:01:01 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: Catch more locking problems with
flush_work()
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:26:33PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:36:32AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Does looking at the second patch help? Basically schedule_work() can run
> > the callback right between the time the mutex is acquired and
> > flush_work() is called:
> >
> > CPU0 CPU1
> >
> > <irq>
> > schedule_work() mutex_lock(&mutex)
> > <irq return>
> > my_work() flush_work()
> > mutex_lock(&mutex)
> > <deadlock>
>
> Get you point. It is a problem. But your patch could introduece false
> positive since when flush_work() is called that very work may finish
> running already.
>
> So I think we need the lock_map_acquire()/lock_map_release() only when
> the work is under processing, no?
But start_flush_work() has tried take care of this issue except it
doesn't add work->lockdep_map into the chain.
So does below patch help?
Thanks,
Yong
---
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@...driver.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:44:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue:lockdep: make flush_work notice deadlock
Connet the lock chain by aquiring work->lockdep_map when
the tobe-flush work is running.
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Reported-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bc867e8..c096b05 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2461,6 +2461,8 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr,
lock_map_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
else
lock_map_acquire_read(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
+ lock_map_acquire(&work->lockdep_map);
+ lock_map_release(&work->lockdep_map);
lock_map_release(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
return true;
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists